| Title |
The assumption of radon-induced cancer risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Causes & Control, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10552-015-0638-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krzysztof W. Fornalski, Rod Adams, Wade Allison, Leslie E. Corrice, Jerry M. Cuttler, Chris Davey, Ludwik Dobrzyński, Vincent J. Esposito, Ludwig E. Feinendegen, Leo S. Gomez, Patricia Lewis, Jeffrey Mahn, Mark L. Miller, Charles W. Pennington, Bill Sacks, Shizuyo Sutou, James S. Welsh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 23% |
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Engineering | 2 | 9% |
| Energy | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#950
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,716
of 266,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.