↓ Skip to main content

Disability in the individual ADL, IADL, and mobility among older adults: A prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Disability in the individual ADL, IADL, and mobility among older adults: A prospective cohort study
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12603-017-0891-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nienke Bleijenberg, N.P.A. Zuithoff, A.K. Smith, N.J. de Wit, M.J. Schuurmans

Abstract

To examine the risk of disability in 15 individual ADL, IADL, and mobility in older adults by age; and to assess the association of multimorbidity, gender, and education with disability. A prospective cohort study. The sample included 805 community-dwelling older people aged 60+ living in the Netherlands. Disability was assessed using the Katz-15 Index of Independence in Basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and one mobility item. Disability in any of these activities was defined as the inability to perform the activity without assistance. The risk of disability by age for each individual ADL, IADL, and for mobility was assessed using Generalized mixed models. Disability in activities as household tasks, traveling, shopping, and continence had the highest risk and increased rapidly with age. The risk traveling disability among people aged 65 with two comorbidities increase from 9% to 37% at age 85. Disability in using the telephone, managing medications, finances, transferring, and toileting, had a very low risk and hardly increased with age. Compared to those without chronic conditions, those with ≥ 3 chronic conditions had a 3 to 5 times higher risk of developing disability. Males had a higher risk of disability in managing medication (P=0.005), and preparing meals (P=0.019), whereas females had a higher risk of disability with traveling (P=0.001). No association between education and disability on the individual ADL, IADL, and mobility was observed. Older adults were mostly disabled in physical related activities, whereas disability in more cognitive related activities was less often experienced. The impact of multimorbidity on disability in each activity was substantial, while education was not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 37 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 17%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 54 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2017.
All research outputs
#8,000,441
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#994
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,487
of 331,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.