↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: Corrigendum: Selective targeting of HDAC1/2 elicits anticancer effects through Gli1 acetylation in preclinical models of SHH Medulloblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: Corrigendum: Selective targeting of HDAC1/2 elicits anticancer effects through Gli1 acetylation in preclinical models of SHH Medulloblastoma
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep46645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Coni, Anna Barbara Mancuso, Laura Di Magno, Giulia Sdruscia, Simona Manni, Silvia Maria Serrao, Dante Rotili, Eleonora Spiombi, Francesca Bufalieri, Marialaura Petroni, Monika Kusio-Kobialka, Enrico De Smaele, Elisabetta Ferretti, Carlo Capalbo, Antonello Mai, Pawel Niewiadomski, Isabella Screpanti, Lucia Di Marcotullio, Gianluca Canettieri

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,414,746
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#105,986
of 123,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,625
of 309,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,377
of 4,145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 123,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.