↓ Skip to main content

Shock index: blunt clinical predictions

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Shock index: blunt clinical predictions
Published in
Critical Care, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc13125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boning Li, Christine Fanning, Amit Patel, Amay Parikh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,469
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,249
of 315,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#75
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.