| Title |
The Impact of Cost Displays on Primary Care Physician Laboratory Test Ordering
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2672-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel M. Horn, Kate E. Koplan, Margaret D. Senese, E. John Orav, Thomas D. Sequist |
| Abstract |
Physicians are under increased pressure to help control rising health care costs, though they lack information regarding cost implications of patient care decisions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 47% |
| Canada | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Scientists | 7 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 31 | 27% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2017.
All research outputs
#477,151
of 24,814,419 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#384
of 8,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,524
of 314,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,814,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.