You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification of New Genetic Susceptibility Loci for Breast Cancer Through Consideration of Gene‐Environment Interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetic Epidemiology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/gepi.21771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anja Schoeps, Anja Rudolph, Petra Seibold, Alison M. Dunning, Roger L. Milne, Stig E. Bojesen, Anthony Swerdlow, Irene Andrulis, Hermann Brenner, Sabine Behrens, Nicholas Orr, Michael Jones, Alan Ashworth, Jingmei Li, Helen Cramp, Dan Connley, Kamila Czene, Hatef Darabi, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Jonine D. Figueroa, Julia Knight, Gord Glendon, Anna M. Mulligan, Martine Dumont, Gianluca Severi, Laura Baglietto, Janet Olson, Celine Vachon, Kristen Purrington, Matthieu Moisse, Patrick Neven, Hans Wildiers, Amanda Spurdle, Veli‐Matti Kosma, Vesa Kataja, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Ute Hamann, Yon‐Dschun Ko, Aida K. Dieffenbach, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Núria Malats, José I. Arias Perez, Javier Benítez, Henrik Flyger, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Thérèse Truong, Emilie Cordina‐Duverger, Florence Menegaux, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Lothar Häberle, Matthias W. Beckmann, Arif B. Ekici, Linde Braaf, Femke Atsma, Alexandra J. van den Broek, Enes Makalic, Daniel F. Schmidt, Melissa C. Southey, Angela Cox, Jacques Simard, Graham G. Giles, Diether Lambrechts, Arto Mannermaa, Hiltrud Brauch, Pascal Guénel, Julian Peto, Peter A. Fasching, John Hopper, Dieter Flesch‐Janys, Fergus Couch, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Montserrat Garcia‐Closas, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Per Hall, Douglas F. Easton, Jenny Chang‐Claude |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genetic Epidemiology
#259
of 878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,371
of 321,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetic Epidemiology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 878 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.