↓ Skip to main content

National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 5,388)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
84 X users
facebook
22 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
434 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
762 Mendeley
Title
National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy
Published in
European Spine Journal, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mette Jensen Stochkendahl, Per Kjaer, Jan Hartvigsen, Alice Kongsted, Jens Aaboe, Margrethe Andersen, Mikkel Ø. Andersen, Gilles Fournier, Betina Højgaard, Martin Bach Jensen, Lone Donbæk Jensen, Ture Karbo, Lilli Kirkeskov, Martin Melbye, Lone Morsel-Carlsen, Jan Nordsteen, Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson, Zoreh Rasti, Peter Frost Silbye, Morten Zebitz Steiness, Simon Tarp, Morten Vaagholt

Abstract

To summarise recommendations about 20 non-surgical interventions for recent onset (<12 weeks) non-specific low back pain (LBP) and lumbar radiculopathy (LR) based on two guidelines from the Danish Health Authority. Two multidisciplinary working groups formulated recommendations based on the GRADE approach. Sixteen recommendations were based on evidence, and four on consensus. Management of LBP and LR should include information about prognosis, warning signs, and advise to remain active. If treatment is needed, the guidelines suggest using patient education, different types of supervised exercise, and manual therapy. The guidelines recommend against acupuncture, routine use of imaging, targeted treatment, extraforaminal glucocorticoid injection, paracetamol, NSAIDs, and opioids. Recommendations are based on low to moderate quality evidence or on consensus, but are well aligned with recommendations from international guidelines. The guideline working groups recommend that research efforts in relation to all aspects of management of LBP and LR be intensified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 762 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 759 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 120 16%
Student > Bachelor 107 14%
Researcher 59 8%
Other 47 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 6%
Other 145 19%
Unknown 237 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 200 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 164 22%
Sports and Recreations 34 4%
Neuroscience 26 3%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Other 62 8%
Unknown 263 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2023.
All research outputs
#512,471
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#41
of 5,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,563
of 326,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.