| Title |
Selecting deep brain stimulation or infusion therapies in advanced Parkinson’s disease: an evidence-based review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-012-6798-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jens Volkmann, Alberto Albanese, Angelo Antonini, K. Ray Chaudhuri, Carl E. Clarke, Rob M. A. de Bie, Günther Deuschl, Karla Eggert, Jean-Luc Houeto, Jaime Kulisevsky, Dag Nyholm, Per Odin, Karen Østergaard, Werner Poewe, Pierre Pollak, Jose Martin Rabey, Olivier Rascol, Evzen Ruzicka, Michael Samuel, Hans Speelman, Olof Sydow, Francesc Valldeoriola, Chris van der Linden, Wolfgang Oertel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 25% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 39% |
| Neuroscience | 31 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2013.
All research outputs
#21,275,730
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#4,294
of 5,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,457
of 295,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#41
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.