You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1182/blood-2013-08-518886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elli Papaemmanuil, Moritz Gerstung, Luca Malcovati, Sudhir Tauro, Gunes Gundem, Peter Van Loo, Chris J. Yoon, Peter Ellis, David C. Wedge, Andrea Pellagatti, Adam Shlien, Michael John Groves, Simon A. Forbes, Keiran Raine, Jon Hinton, Laura J. Mudie, Stuart McLaren, Claire Hardy, Calli Latimer, Matteo G. Della Porta, Sarah O'Meara, Ilaria Ambaglio, Anna Galli, Adam P. Butler, Gunilla Walldin, Jon W. Teague, Lynn Quek, Alex Sternberg, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini, Nicholas C.P. Cross, Anthony R. Green, Jacqueline Boultwood, Paresh Vyas, Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg, David Bowen, Mario Cazzola, Michael R. Stratton, Peter J. Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 55% |
| Russia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 929 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 900 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 164 | 18% |
| Researcher | 153 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 102 | 11% |
| Other | 76 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 69 | 7% |
| Other | 182 | 20% |
| Unknown | 183 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 283 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 209 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 142 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 53 | 6% |
| Unknown | 215 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,237,048
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#972
of 33,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,625
of 215,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#13
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.