↓ Skip to main content

Downregulation of neuropilin-1 on macrophages modulates antibody-mediated tumoricidal activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Downregulation of neuropilin-1 on macrophages modulates antibody-mediated tumoricidal activity
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00262-017-2002-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kosuke Kawaguchi, Eiji Suzuki, Mariko Nishie, Isao Kii, Tatsuki R. Kataoka, Masahiro Hirata, Masashi Inoue, Fengling Pu, Keiko Iwaisako, Moe Tsuda, Ayane Yamaguchi, Hironori Haga, Masatoshi Hagiwara, Masakazu Toi

Abstract

Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1)-expressing macrophages are engaged in antitumor immune functions via various mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the role of NRP-1 on macrophages in antibody-mediated tumoricidal activity. Treatment of macrophages with NRP-1 knockdown or an anti-NRP-1-neutralizing antibody significantly suppressed antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and modulated cytokine secretion from macrophages in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo studies using a humanized mouse model bearing human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer xenografts showed that antibody-mediated antitumor activity and tumor infiltration of CD4(+) T lymphocytes were significantly downregulated when peripheral blood mononuclear cells in which NRP-1 was knocked down were co-administered with an anti-HER2 antibody. These results revealed that NRP-1 expressed on macrophages plays an important role in antibody-mediated antitumor immunity. Taken together, the induction of NRP-1 on macrophages may be a therapeutic indicator for antibody treatments that exert antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity activity, although further studies are needed in order to support this hypothesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Researcher 3 18%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
#13,373,196
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#1,871
of 2,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,224
of 311,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#22
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.