↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal parasites in food handlers, southern Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Environmental Health Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal parasites in food handlers, southern Brazil
Published in
International Journal of Environmental Health Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1080/09603123.2013.857392
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristiane Maria Colli, Angelica Sayuri Mizutani, Vanessa Aparecida Martins, Érika Cristina Ferreira, Mônica Lúcia Gomes

Abstract

In this study, the prevalence and risk factors for enteroparasites were determined in food handlers from Maringá, Paraná State, southern Brazil. Fecal and subungual materials of 150 street food vendors were analyzed by the methods of Lutz, Faust, and Mello, respectively. A questionnaire on hygiene and sanitary conditions of the workplace and of domicile was applied. The prevalence of enteroparasites was 28%, and the protozoa infection was more expressive (21.3%) than by helminths (6.7%), but without significant difference (p > 0.05). Entamoeba coli was the most frequent species occurring in 15.3%, while the prevalence of protozoa pathogenic was low (Giardia lamblia: 2.7% and Entamoeba histolytica: 0.7%). The subungual material presented negative results. The presence of pets in domiciles has increased twice the risk of infection. The working conditions of the majority of street food vendors were inappropriate. The results highlight the need for more rigorous programs of continuing education, parasitological examination every six months, and health surveillance. In this way, the quality of the service provided to the population can be improved and the transmission of food-borne diseases can be prevented.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 14 30%