↓ Skip to main content

Minimal Excision and Primary Suture is a Cost‐Efficient Definitive Treatment for Pilonidal Disease with Low Morbidity: A Population‐Based Interventional and a Cross‐Sectional Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Minimal Excision and Primary Suture is a Cost‐Efficient Definitive Treatment for Pilonidal Disease with Low Morbidity: A Population‐Based Interventional and a Cross‐Sectional Cohort Study
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3828-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaveh Khodakaram, Joachim Stark, Ida Höglund, Roland E. Andersson

Abstract

Conventional treatment of pilonidal disease with wide excision is associated with high morbidity. We describe the short- and long-term results and the impact on the health care system of a simple operation performed in the office under local anaesthesia, consisting of minimal excision of pilonidal sinuses with primary suture-the modified Lord-Millar operation (mLM). All patients operated with mLM from February 2008 till November 2012 were prospectively followed for recurrence by telephone interviews and examination of symptomatic patients till July 2015. The outcome is compared with that in all patients operated with conventional wide excision from January 2003 till February 2008. The effects on the health care system of a consistent use of mLM is analysed by comparing the management of all patients with pilonidal disease at three hospitals during 2013 and 2014. Some 129 patients underwent conventional surgical treatment, and 113 had the mLM operation. The mLM operation was more often performed under local anaesthesia, was less often admitted to hospital, had fewer post-operative health care visits (2.4 vs. 14.6, p < 0.001) and a shorter sick leave (1.0 vs. 34.7 days, p < 0.001) indicating faster wound healing. The estimated 5-year recurrence rate was similar (32 vs. 23%, p = 0.091). The cost per operated patient was lower (2231 vs. 6222 EUR, p < 0.001). The hospital consistently applying the mLM operation used less resources for pilonidal diseased patients (34,545 vs. 77,421 EUR per 100,000 inhabitants and year). The mLM operation is simple, cost-efficient and has low morbidity and good long-term results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,687,450
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#2,812
of 4,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,662
of 419,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#38
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.