↓ Skip to main content

An Analytic Framework for Aligning Observational and Randomized Trial Data: Application to Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Coronary Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Statistics in Biosciences, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
An Analytic Framework for Aligning Observational and Randomized Trial Data: Application to Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Coronary Heart Disease
Published in
Statistics in Biosciences, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12561-012-9073-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sengwee Toh, Joann E. Manson

Abstract

We describe a conceptual analytic framework for aligning observational and randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. The framework allows one to 1) use observational data to estimate treatment effects comparable to their RCT counterparts, 2) properly include early events that occur soon after treatment initiation in the analysis of observational data, 3) estimate various treatment effects that are of clinical and scientific relevance while appropriately adjusting for time-varying confounders in both the RCT and observational analyses, 4) assess the generalizability of RCT findings in the more diverse populations generally found in the observational data, and 5) combine both types of data to study associations that cannot be addressed by one study or a single dataset. We describe the theoretical application of this framework to the Women's Health Initiative data to examine the relation between postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease. The analytic framework can be tailored to specific exposure-outcome associations and data sources, and may be refined as more is learned about its strengths and limitations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,887,556
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Statistics in Biosciences
#25
of 69 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,009
of 173,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistics in Biosciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 69 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them