↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Anesthesia and Pain Management on Cognitive Dysfunction After Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of Anesthesia and Pain Management on Cognitive Dysfunction After Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3363-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael G. Zywiel, Atul Prabhu, Anthony V. Perruccio, Rajiv Gandhi

Abstract

Despite the overall success of total joint arthroplasty, patients undergoing this procedure remain susceptible to cognitive decline and/or delirium, collectively termed postoperative cognitive dysfunction. However, no consensus exists as to whether general or regional anesthesia results in a lower likelihood that a patient may experience this complication, and controversy surrounds the role of pain management strategies to minimize the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 153 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Other 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 9 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 38 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2022.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5,161
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,999
of 226,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#35
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.