↓ Skip to main content

Optimal foraging of a herbivorous lizard, the green iguana in a seasonal environment

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, August 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Optimal foraging of a herbivorous lizard, the green iguana in a seasonal environment
Published in
Oecologia, August 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00323497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wouter D. van Marken Lichtenbelt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 7%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Professor 5 18%
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 68%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,681
of 4,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,888
of 20,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.