| Title |
A multicentric individually-tailored controlled trial of education and professional support to nursing home staff: Research protocol and baseline data of the IQUARE study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12603-013-0008-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philipe de Souto Barreto, M. Lapeyre-Mestre, C. Mathieu, C. Piau, C. Bouget, F. Cayla, B. Vellas, Y. Rolland |
| Abstract |
Whilst the number of people living in nursing homes (NH) is expected to rise, research on NH quality is scarce. The purpose of this article is to describe the research protocol of the IQUARE study and to present its baseline data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 25% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 23% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,077,286
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#1,651
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,705
of 291,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.