| Title |
Local scour and the laws of scour pit’s shape downstream of debris flow sabo dam
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mountain Science, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11629-013-2362-9 |
| Authors |
Hua-li Pan, Shun Yang, Guo-qiang Ou, Jiang-cheng Huang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 4 | 67% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,853,240
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#28
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,489
of 301,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.