↓ Skip to main content

Continuous Spike and Wave in Slow-Wave Sleep in a Patient With Rett Syndrome and in a Patient With Lhermitte-Duclos Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis 1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child Neurology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous Spike and Wave in Slow-Wave Sleep in a Patient With Rett Syndrome and in a Patient With Lhermitte-Duclos Syndrome and Neurofibromatosis 1
Published in
Journal of Child Neurology, November 2013
DOI 10.1177/0883073813509888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sushanth Bhat, Xue Ming, Rony Dekermenjian, Sudhansu Chokroverty

Abstract

Continuous spike and wave in slow-wave sleep (CSWS) is an electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern characterized by generalized spike-wave discharges occurring for at least 85% of non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep, with marked attenuation during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. It has been described in a large number of structural and nonstructural neurologic conditions and is associated with epilepsy, behavioral disturbances, and severe neuropsychiatric impairment. We describe continuous spike and wave in slow-wave sleep in 2 patients (one with Rett syndrome and the other with Lhermitte-Duclos syndrome). To our knowledge, continuous spike and wave in slow-wave sleep has not been previously described in these conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Psychology 8 22%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,210,424
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child Neurology
#2,025
of 2,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,667
of 301,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child Neurology
#29
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.