| Title |
Impacts of climate change on plant diseases—opinions and trends
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-012-9936-1 |
| Authors |
Marco Pautasso, Thomas F. Döring, Matteo Garbelotto, Lorenzo Pellis, Mike J. Jeger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 574 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 135 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 108 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 85 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 37 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 14% |
| Unknown | 93 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 296 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 87 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 8% |
| Unknown | 118 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,528,480
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#6
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,159
of 257,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.