| Title |
Definition and Usage of the Term “Overuse Injury” in the US High School and Collegiate Sport Epidemiology Literature: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-013-0124-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen G. Roos, Stephen W. Marshall |
| Abstract |
A number of epidemiologic and surveillance-based studies of sports injury provide statistics on, and sometimes discussion of, overuse injuries. However, there is no consensus on the definition of "overuse." Some studies consider "overuse" as a mechanism of injury while others use a diagnosis-based definition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Philippines | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 47 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,757,679
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,684
of 2,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,407
of 187,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.