↓ Skip to main content

Guillain–Barré Syndrome—A Classical Autoimmune Disease Triggered by Infection or Vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Guillain–Barré Syndrome—A Classical Autoimmune Disease Triggered by Infection or Vaccination
Published in
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12016-010-8213-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eitan Israeli, Nancy Agmon-Levin, Miri Blank, Joab Chapman, Yehuda Shoenfeld

Abstract

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare autoimmune disorder, the incidence of which is estimated to be 0.6-4/100,000 person/year worldwide. Often, GBS occurs a few days or weeks after the patient has had symptoms of a respiratory or gastrointestinal microbial infection. The disorder is sub-acute developing over the course of hours or days up to 3 to 4 weeks. About a third of all cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome are preceded by Campylobacter jejuni infection. C. jejuni strains isolated from GBS patients have a lipooligosaccharide (LOS) with a GM1-like structure. Molecular mimicry between LOS and the peripheral nerves as a cause of GBS was demonstrated in animal models of human GBS. Following the "swine flu" virus vaccine program in the USA in 1976, an increase in incidence of GBS was observed and the calculated relative risk was 6.2. Later studies have found that influenza vaccines contained structures that can induce anti-GM1 (ganglioside) antibodies after inoculation into mice. More recent information has suggested that the occurrence of GBS after currently used influenza and other vaccines is rare. GBS involves genetic and environmental factors, may be triggered by infections or vaccinations, and predisposition can be predicted by analyzing some of these factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 126 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 20 15%
Other 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Other 36 27%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 7%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,036,908
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#234
of 690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,872
of 101,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.