| Title |
Kamchatka subduction zone, May 2013: the Mw 8.3 deep earthquake, preceding shallow swarm and numerous deep aftershocks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11200-013-1038-9 |
| Authors |
Aleš Špičák, Jiří Vaněk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2013.
All research outputs
#6,259,973
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
#7
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,824
of 309,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them