↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of the Sleep Disorders Associated with Parkinson's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Treatment of the Sleep Disorders Associated with Parkinson's Disease
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13311-013-0236-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lynn Marie Trotti, Donald L. Bliwise

Abstract

Sleep disorders are common in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), and preliminary work has suggested viable treatment options for many of these disorders. For rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, melatonin and clonazepam are most commonly used, while rivastigmine might be a useful option in patients whose behaviors are refractory to the former. Optimal treatments for insomnia in PD have yet to be determined, but preliminary evidence suggests that cognitive-behavioral therapy, light therapy, eszopiclone, donepezil, and melatonin might be beneficial. Use of the wake-promoting agent modafinil results in significant improvement in subjective measures of excessive daytime sleepiness, but not of fatigue. Optimal treatment of restless legs syndrome and obstructive sleep apnea in PD are not yet established, although a trial of continuous positive airway pressure for sleep apnea was recently completed in PD patients. In those patients with early morning motor dysfunction and disrupted sleep, the rotigotine patch provides significant benefit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 30%
Psychology 12 9%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 39 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2013.
All research outputs
#4,365,789
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#464
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,108
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.