↓ Skip to main content

Statistical methodology in oral and dental research: Pitfalls and recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Dental Medicine, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical methodology in oral and dental research: Pitfalls and recommendations
Published in
Journal of Dental Medicine, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.02.013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ailish Hannigan, Christopher D. Lynch

Abstract

This study describes the pitfalls for commonly used statistical techniques in dental research and gives some recommendations for avoiding them. It also explores the potential of some of the newer statistical techniques for dental research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
France 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 169 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 12%
Student > Master 21 11%
Professor 18 10%
Researcher 18 10%
Other 47 26%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 58%
Engineering 6 3%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 4 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,388,554
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Medicine
#809
of 1,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,418
of 206,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Medicine
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.