| Title |
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center experience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-013-3030-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mun Ki Choi, Gwang Ha Kim, Do Youn Park, Geun Am Song, Dong Uk Kim, Dong Yup Ryu, Bong Eun Lee, Jae Hoon Cheong, Mong Cho |
| Abstract |
In Korea, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted for the treatment of early gastric cancers (EGCs). However, the understanding of the long-term clinical outcome of ESD for EGC remains insufficient. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the long-term clinical outcome and efficacy of ESD for the treatment of EGCs, including the clinical application of the expanded criteria for ESD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 21% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2013.
All research outputs
#12,595,605
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#2,470
of 6,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,165
of 198,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#17
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.