| Title |
Drug-related problems identified in medication reviews by Australian pharmacists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-009-9287-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew C. Stafford, Peter C. Tenni, Gregory M. Peterson, Shane L. Jackson, Anne Hejlesen, Christine Villesen, Mette Rasmussen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 31% |
| Researcher | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2013.
All research outputs
#5,505,382
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#362
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,662
of 113,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them