You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trial for Reducing Weight Retention in New Mums: a randomised controlled trial evaluating a low intensity, postpartum weight management programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jhn.12193 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. A. Wilkinson, P. van der Pligt, K. S. Gibbons, H. D. McIntyre |
| Abstract |
Failure to return to pregnancy weight by 6 months postpartum is associated with long-term obesity, as well as adverse health outcomes. This research evaluated a postpartum weight management programme for women with a body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg m(-2) that combined behaviour change principles and a low-intensity delivery format with postpartum nutrition information. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 196 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 66 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,219,667
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#360
of 1,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,280
of 318,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.