| Title |
Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-486 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate MacNaughton, Samia Chreim, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault |
| Abstract |
The move towards enhancing teamwork and interprofessional collaboration in health care raises issues regarding the management of professional boundaries and the relationship among health care providers. This qualitative study explores how roles are constructed within interprofessional health care teams. It focuses on elucidating the different types of role boundaries, the influences on role construction and the implications for professionals and patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 326 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 91 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 74 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,354,532
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,446
of 7,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,778
of 302,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#104
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.