| Title |
Long-term effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding on type 2 diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-009-0715-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Abbatini, M. Rizzello, G. Casella, G. Alessandri, D. Capoccia, F. Leonetti, N. Basso |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with that of laparoscopic gastric bypass (GBP) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (AGB) for glucose homeostasis in morbidly obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at a 3-year follow-up assessment and to elucidate the role of weight loss in the T2DM resolution after SG. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,295,146
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#214
of 6,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,538
of 108,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,920 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.