↓ Skip to main content

Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
478 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1355 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities
Published in
Ecology Letters, December 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etienne Laliberté, Jessie A. Wells, Fabrice DeClerck, Daniel J. Metcalfe, Carla P. Catterall, Cibele Queiroz, Isabelle Aubin, Stephen P. Bonser, Yi Ding, Jennifer M. Fraterrigo, Sean McNamara, John W. Morgan, Dalia Sánchez Merlos, Peter A. Vesk, Margaret M. Mayfield

Abstract

Ecosystem resilience depends on functional redundancy (the number of species contributing similarly to an ecosystem function) and response diversity (how functionally similar species respond differently to disturbance). Here, we explore how land-use change impacts these attributes in plant communities, using data from 18 land-use intensity gradients that represent five biomes and > 2800 species. We identify functional groups using multivariate analysis of plant traits which influence ecosystem processes. Functional redundancy is calculated as the species richness within each group, and response diversity as the multivariate within-group dispersion in response trait space, using traits that influence responses to disturbances. Meta-analysis across all datasets showed that land-use intensification significantly reduced both functional redundancy and response diversity, although specific relationships varied considerably among the different land-use gradients. These results indicate that intensified management of ecosystems for resource extraction can increase their vulnerability to future disturbances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 22 2%
United States 13 <1%
Germany 11 <1%
Colombia 7 <1%
Sweden 7 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Argentina 4 <1%
Other 32 2%
Unknown 1242 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 321 24%
Researcher 278 21%
Student > Master 214 16%
Student > Bachelor 95 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 6%
Other 219 16%
Unknown 149 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 661 49%
Environmental Science 378 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 2%
Social Sciences 10 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 <1%
Other 38 3%
Unknown 226 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,033,766
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#1,582
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,117
of 178,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.