↓ Skip to main content

Pivotal Advance: Avian colony‐stimulating factor 1 (CSF‐1), interleukin‐34 (IL‐34), and CSF‐1 receptor genes and gene products

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Leukocyte Biology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
18 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pivotal Advance: Avian colony‐stimulating factor 1 (CSF‐1), interleukin‐34 (IL‐34), and CSF‐1 receptor genes and gene products
Published in
Journal of Leukocyte Biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1189/jlb.0909624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Garceau, Jacqueline Smith, Ian R. Paton, Megan Davey, Mario A. Fares, David P. Sester, David W. Burt, David A. Hume

Abstract

Macrophages are involved in many aspects of development, host defense, pathology, and homeostasis. Their normal differentiation, proliferation, and survival are controlled by CSF-1 via the activation of the CSF1R. A recently discovered cytokine, IL-34, was shown to bind the same receptor in humans. Chicken is a widely used model organism in developmental biology, but the factors that control avian myelopoiesis have not been identified previously. The CSF-1, IL-34, and CSF1R genes in chicken and zebra finch were identified from respective genomic/cDNA sequence resources. Comparative analysis of the avian CSF1R loci revealed likely orthologs of mammalian macrophage-specific promoters and enhancers, and the CSF1R gene is expressed in the developing chick embryo in a pattern consistent with macrophage-specific expression. Chicken CSF-1 and IL-34 were expressed in HEK293 cells and shown to elicit macrophage growth from chicken BM cells in culture. Comparative sequence and co-evolution analysis across all vertebrates suggests that the two ligands interact with distinct regions of the CSF1R. These studies demonstrate that there are two separate ligands for a functional CSF1R across all vertebrates.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 7 7%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Leukocyte Biology
#1,136
of 4,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,593
of 173,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Leukocyte Biology
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.