↓ Skip to main content

Medulloblastoma Down Under 2013: a report from the third annual meeting of the International Medulloblastoma Working Group

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Medulloblastoma Down Under 2013: a report from the third annual meeting of the International Medulloblastoma Working Group
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1213-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas G. Gottardo, Jordan R. Hansford, Jacqueline P. McGlade, Frank Alvaro, David M. Ashley, Simon Bailey, David L. Baker, Franck Bourdeaut, Yoon-Jae Cho, Moira Clay, Steven C. Clifford, Richard J. Cohn, Catherine H. Cole, Peter B. Dallas, Peter Downie, François Doz, David W. Ellison, Raelene Endersby, Paul G. Fisher, Timothy Hassall, John A. Heath, Hilary L. Hii, David T. W. Jones, Reimar Junckerstorff, Stewart Kellie, Marcel Kool, Rishi S. Kotecha, Peter Lichter, Stephen J. Laughton, Sharon Lee, Geoff McCowage, Paul A. Northcott, James M. Olson, Roger J. Packer, Stefan M. Pfister, Torsten Pietsch, Barry Pizer, Scott L. Pomeroy, Marc Remke, Giles W. Robinson, Stefan Rutkowski, Tobias Schoep, Anang A. Shelat, Clinton F. Stewart, Michael Sullivan, Michael D. Taylor, Brandon Wainwright, Thomas Walwyn, William A. Weiss, Dan Williamson, Amar Gajjar

Abstract

Medulloblastoma is curable in approximately 70% of patients. Over the past decade, progress in improving survival using conventional therapies has stalled, resulting in reduced quality of life due to treatment-related side effects, which are a major concern in survivors. The vast amount of genomic and molecular data generated over the last 5-10 years encourages optimism that improved risk stratification and new molecular targets will improve outcomes. It is now clear that medulloblastoma is not a single-disease entity, but instead consists of at least four distinct molecular subgroups: WNT/Wingless, Sonic Hedgehog, Group 3, and Group 4. The Medulloblastoma Down Under 2013 meeting, which convened at Bunker Bay, Australia, brought together 50 leading clinicians and scientists. The 2-day agenda included focused sessions on pathology and molecular stratification, genomics and mouse models, high-throughput drug screening, and clinical trial design. The meeting established a global action plan to translate novel biologic insights and drug targeting into treatment regimens to improve outcomes. A consensus was reached in several key areas, with the most important being that a novel classification scheme for medulloblastoma based on the four molecular subgroups, as well as histopathologic features, should be presented for consideration in the upcoming fifth edition of the World Health Organization's classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Three other notable areas of agreement were as follows: (1) to establish a central repository of annotated mouse models that are readily accessible and freely available to the international research community; (2) to institute common eligibility criteria between the Children's Oncology Group and the International Society of Paediatric Oncology Europe and initiate joint or parallel clinical trials; (3) to share preliminary high-throughput screening data across discovery labs to hasten the development of novel therapeutics. Medulloblastoma Down Under 2013 was an effective forum for meaningful discussion, which resulted in enhancing international collaborative clinical and translational research of this rare disease. This template could be applied to other fields to devise global action plans addressing all aspects of a disease, from improved disease classification, treatment stratification, and drug targeting to superior treatment regimens to be assessed in cooperative international clinical trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 144 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 16%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 12 8%
Other 41 27%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,746,281
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#375
of 2,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,472
of 304,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.