↓ Skip to main content

Targeting the Immune System in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Oncology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Targeting the Immune System in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11864-013-0250-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepa Rangachari, Julie R. Brahmer

Abstract

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Traditional cytotoxic agents and their attendant toxicities have remained the mainstay of systemic therapy for this disease, until now. With the identification of novel molecular and immune cancer-specific aberrancies, molecular agents and immunotherapies have garnered increasing attention as attractive targets, with the potential for improved outcomes while mitigating systemic toxicities seen with traditional cytotoxic agents. Despite a longstanding interest in immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC, results of prior studies of therapeutic vaccines have failed to show durable or convincingly meaningful clinical responses. However, newer trials of therapeutic vaccines and checkpoint inhibitors have yielded more promising results. In particular, the checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway have shown meaningful clinical responses with manageable toxicities. Large phase III studies are underway, the results of which have the potential to revolutionize the way in which we care for patients with NSCLC. More studies also are needed to investigate the potentially synergistic effects of traditional and immune-based therapies. Given their unique antineoplastic effects, novel immune-specific clinical endpoints also are actively being investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,210,424
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#549
of 656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,393
of 197,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Oncology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 656 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.