↓ Skip to main content

Electronic Cigarette Use Among Korean Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study of Market Penetration, Dual Use, and Relationship to Quit Attempts and Former Smoking

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Adolescent Health, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
34 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electronic Cigarette Use Among Korean Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study of Market Penetration, Dual Use, and Relationship to Quit Attempts and Former Smoking
Published in
Journal of Adolescent Health, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.11.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sungkyu Lee, Rachel A. Grana, Stanton A. Glantz

Abstract

As elsewhere, in South Korea electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are marketed, in part, as a smoking cessation aid. We assessed the prevalence of e-cigarette use among Korean adolescents and the relationship between e-cigarette use and current (past 30-day) smoking, cigarettes/day, attempts to quit conventional cigarettes, and ceasing to use cigarettes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 308 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 17%
Researcher 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Other 21 7%
Other 77 24%
Unknown 54 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 24%
Psychology 33 10%
Social Sciences 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 7%
Other 67 21%
Unknown 65 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#267,074
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Adolescent Health
#181
of 4,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,303
of 315,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Adolescent Health
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.