↓ Skip to main content

Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: assessing performance by combining national cardiac audit with maternity data

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: assessing performance by combining national cardiac audit with maternity data
Published in
Heart, November 2013
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena M Gardiner, Alexander Kovacevic, Laila B van der Heijden, Patricia W Pfeiffer, Rodney CG Franklin, John L Gibbs, Ian E Averiss, Joan M LaRovere

Abstract

Determine maternity hospital and lesion-specific prenatal detection rates of major congenital heart disease (mCHD) for hospitals referring prenatally and postnatally to one Congenital Cardiac Centre, and assess interhospital relative performance (relative risk, RR).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#3,247
of 6,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,621
of 320,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#18
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.