| Title |
A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: the distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-2-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John McGrath, Sukanta Saha, Joy Welham, Ossama El Saadi, Clare MacCauley, David Chant |
| Abstract |
Understanding variations in the incidence of schizophrenia is a crucial step in unravelling the aetiology of this group of disorders. The aims of this review are to systematically identify studies related to the incidence of schizophrenia, to describe the key features of these studies, and to explore the distribution of rates derived from these studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 956 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | <1% |
| Unknown | 914 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 156 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 125 | 13% |
| Researcher | 111 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 76 | 8% |
| Other | 169 | 18% |
| Unknown | 179 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 250 | 26% |
| Psychology | 165 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 81 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 66 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 4% |
| Other | 126 | 13% |
| Unknown | 225 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,439,228
of 24,585,148 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,596
of 3,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,552
of 60,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.