↓ Skip to main content

The fMRI signal, slow cortical potential and consciousness

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 2,313)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
580 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
686 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The fMRI signal, slow cortical potential and consciousness
Published in
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, June 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Biyu J. He, Marcus E. Raichle

Abstract

As functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become a driving force in cognitive neuroscience, it is crucial to understand the neural basis of the fMRI signal. Here, we discuss a novel neurophysiological correlate of the fMRI signal, the slow cortical potential (SCP), which also seems to modulate the power of higher-frequency activity, the more established neurophysiological correlate of the fMRI signal. We further propose a hypothesis for the involvement of the SCP in the emergence of consciousness, and review existing data that lend support to our proposal. This hypothesis, unlike several previous theories of consciousness, is firmly rooted in physiology and as such is entirely amenable to empirical testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 580 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 686 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 3%
United Kingdom 14 2%
Germany 8 1%
Canada 5 <1%
France 4 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Other 20 3%
Unknown 598 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 187 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 163 24%
Student > Master 60 9%
Professor 59 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 55 8%
Other 115 17%
Unknown 47 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 196 29%
Neuroscience 110 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 10%
Engineering 34 5%
Other 82 12%
Unknown 91 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 386. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2022.
All research outputs
#81,115
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#33
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161
of 124,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Cognitive Sciences
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.