↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of early changes in 3H-fluorothymidine uptake after treatment with gefitinib in human tumor xenograft in comparison with Ki-67 and phospho-EGFR expression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of early changes in 3H-fluorothymidine uptake after treatment with gefitinib in human tumor xenograft in comparison with Ki-67 and phospho-EGFR expression
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Songji Zhao, Yuji Kuge, Yan Zhao, Satoshi Takeuchi, Kenji Hirata, Toshiki Takei, Tohru Shiga, Hirotoshi Dosaka-Akita, Nagara Tamaki

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether early changes in 3'-deoxy-3'-3H-fluorothymidine (3H-FLT) uptake can reflect the antiproliferative effect of gefitinib in a human tumor xenograft, in comparison with the histopathological markers, Ki-67 and phosphorylated EGFR (phospho-EGFR).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Researcher 3 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,418
of 8,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,395
of 215,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#74
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.