↓ Skip to main content

EGFR mutation status and its impact on survival of Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
EGFR mutation status and its impact on survival of Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases
Published in
Tumor Biology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13277-013-1323-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongdong Luo, Xin Ye, Zheng Hu, Kaiwen Peng, Ye Song, Xiaolu Yin, Guanshan Zhu, Qunsheng Ji, Yuping Peng

Abstract

Brain metastasis (BM) is a leading cause of death in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR mutations in primary NSCLC lesions have been associated with sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Therefore, it has become important to understand EGFR mutation status in BM lesions of NSCLC, and its clinical implications. BM samples of 136 NSCLC patients from South China, in which 15 had paired primary lung tumors, were retrospectively analyzed for EGFR mutation by amplification mutation refractory system (ARMS). Effect of BM EGFR mutations on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. EGFR mutations were detected in 52.9% (72 of 136) of the BM lesions, with preference in female and never-smokers. A concordance rate of 93.3% (14 of 15) was found between the primary NSCLC and corresponding BM. Positive prediction value of testing primary NSCLCs for BM EGFR mutation is 100.0 %, and negative prediction value is 87.5%. Median PFS of BM surgery was 12 and 10 months (P = 0.594) in the wild-type and mutant group, respectively. Median OS of BM surgery was 24.5 and 15 months (P = 0.248) in the wild-type and mutant group, respectively. In conclusion, EGFR mutation status is highly concordant between the primary NSCLC and corresponding BM. The primary NSCLC could be used as surrogate samples to predict EGFR mutation status in BM lesions or vice versa. Moreover, EGFR mutations showed no significant effect on PFS or OS of NSCLCs with BM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,370
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,370
of 215,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#43
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.