↓ Skip to main content

Fine-Scale Mapping of the FGFR2 Breast Cancer Risk Locus: Putative Functional Variants Differentially Bind FOXA1 and E2F1

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fine-Scale Mapping of the FGFR2 Breast Cancer Risk Locus: Putative Functional Variants Differentially Bind FOXA1 and E2F1
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerstin B. Meyer, Martin O’Reilly, Kyriaki Michailidou, Saskia Carlebur, Stacey L. Edwards, Juliet D. French, Radhika Prathalingham, Joe Dennis, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang, Ines de Santiago, John L. Hopper, Helen Tsimiklis, Carmel Apicella, Melissa C. Southey, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Annegien Broeks, Laura J. Van ’t Veer, Frans B. Hogervorst, Kenneth Muir, Artitaya Lophatananon, Sarah Stewart-Brown, Pornthep Siriwanarangsan, Peter A. Fasching, Michael P. Lux, Arif B. Ekici, Matthias W. Beckmann, Julian Peto, Isabel dos Santos Silva, Olivia Fletcher, Nichola Johnson, Elinor J. Sawyer, Ian Tomlinson, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller, Federick Marme, Andreas Schneeweiss, Christof Sohn, Barbara Burwinkel, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Florence Menegaux, Stig E. Bojesen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Sune F. Nielsen, Henrik Flyger, Roger L. Milne, M. Pilar Zamora, Jose I. Arias, Javier Benitez, Susan Neuhausen, Hoda Anton-Culver, Argyrios Ziogas, Christina C. Dur, Hermann Brenner, Heiko Müller, Volker Arndt, Christa Stegmaier, Alfons Meindl, Rita K. Schmutzler, Christoph Engel, Nina Ditsch, Hiltrud Brauch, Thomas Brüning, Yon-Dschun Ko, The GENICA Network, Heli Nevanlinna, Taru A. Muranen, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Keitaro Matsuo, Hidemi Ito, Hiroji Iwata, Yasushi Yatabe, Thilo Dörk, Sonja Helbig, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Annika Lindblom, Sara Margolin, Arto Mannermaa, Vesa Kataja, Veli-Matti Kosma, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, kConFab Investigators, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Anna H. Wu, Chiu-chen Tseng, David Van Den Berg, Daniel O. Stram, Diether Lambrechts, Bernard Thienpont, Marie-Rose Christiaens, Ann Smeets, Jenny Chang-Claude, Anja Rudolph, Petra Seibold, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Bernardo Bonanni, Loris Bernard, Fergus J. Couch, Janet E. Olson, Xianshu Wang, Kristen Purrington, Graham G. Giles, Gianluca Severi, Laura Baglietto, Catriona McLean, Christopher A. Haiman, Brian E. Henderson, Fredrick Schumacher, Loic Le Marchand, Jacques Simard, Mark S. Goldberg, France Labrèche, Martine Dumont, Soo-Hwang Teo, Cheng-Har Yip, Sze-Yee Phuah, Vessela Kristensen, Grethe Grenaker Alnæs, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale, Wei Zheng, Sandra Deming-Halverson, Martha Shrubsole, Jirong Long, Robert Winqvist, Katri Pylkäs, Arja Jukkola-Vuorinen, Saila Kauppila, Irene L. Andrulis, Julia A. Knight, Gord Glendon, Sandrine Tchatchou, Peter Devilee, Robert A.E.M. Tollenaar, Caroline M. Seynaeve, Montserrat García-Closas, Jonine Figueroa, Stephen J. Chanock, Jolanta Lissowska, Kamila Czene, Hartef Darabi, Kimael Eriksson, Maartje J. Hooning, John W.M. Martens, Ans M.W. van den Ouweland, Carolien H.M. van Deurzen, Per Hall, Jingmei Li, Jianjun Liu, Keith Humphreys, Xiao-Ou Shu, Wei Lu, Yu-Tang Gao, Hui Cai, Angela Cox, Malcolm W.R. Reed, William Blot, Lisa B. Signorello, Qiuyin Cai, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Maya Ghoussaini, Patricia Harrington, Jonathan Tyrer, Daehee Kang, Ji-Yeob Choi, Sue K. Park, Dong-Young Noh, Mikael Hartman, Miao Hui, Wei-Yen Lim, A. Buhari, Ute Hamann, Asta Försti, Thomas Rüdiger, Hans-Ulrich Ulmer, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katarzyna Jaworska, Katarzyna Durda, Suleeporn Sangrajrang, Valerie Gaborieau, Paul Brennan, James McKay, Celine Vachon, Susan Slager, Florentia Fostira, Robert Pilarski, Chen-Yang Shen, Chia-Ni Hsiung, Pei-Ei Wu, Ming-Feng Hou, Anthony Swerdlow, Alan Ashworth, Nick Orr, Minouk J. Schoemaker, Bruce A.J. Ponder, Alison M. Dunning, Douglas F. Easton

Abstract

The 10q26 locus in the second intron of FGFR2 is the locus most strongly associated with estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer in genome-wide association studies. We conducted fine-scale mapping in case-control studies genotyped with a custom chip (iCOGS), comprising 41 studies (n = 89,050) of European ancestry, 9 Asian ancestry studies (n = 13,983), and 2 African ancestry studies (n = 2,028) from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We identified three statistically independent risk signals within the locus. Within risk signals 1 and 3, genetic analysis identified five and two variants, respectively, highly correlated with the most strongly associated SNPs. By using a combination of genetic fine mapping, data on DNase hypersensitivity, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays to study protein-DNA binding, we identified rs35054928, rs2981578, and rs45631563 as putative functional SNPs. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that FOXA1 preferentially bound to the risk-associated allele (C) of rs2981578 and was able to recruit ERα to this site in an allele-specific manner, whereas E2F1 preferentially bound the risk variant of rs35054928. The risk alleles were preferentially found in open chromatin and bound by Ser5 phosphorylated RNA polymerase II, suggesting that the risk alleles are associated with changes in transcription. Chromatin conformation capture demonstrated that the risk region was able to interact with the promoter of FGFR2, the likely target gene of this risk region. A role for FOXA1 in mediating breast cancer susceptibility at this locus is consistent with the finding that the FGFR2 risk locus primarily predisposes to estrogen-receptor-positive disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Finland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 123 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 24 18%
Professor 15 12%
Student > Master 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 15%
Computer Science 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,226,449
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#2,814
of 5,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,624
of 320,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#31
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.