↓ Skip to main content

Ganglion cysts of the wrist: pathophysiology, clinical picture, and management

Overview of attention for article published in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 539)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
Title
Ganglion cysts of the wrist: pathophysiology, clinical picture, and management
Published in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, August 2008
DOI 10.1007/s12178-008-9033-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Warren Gude, Vincent Morelli

Abstract

This article reviews what is known about ganglion cyst formation, natural history (50% of cysts will spontaneously resolve), diagnosis, and management of this common malady. Although the exact mechanism of cyst formation is unknown, most current theories hold that extra-articular mucin "droplets" coalesce to form the main body of the tumor. Only subsequently are the "cyst wall" and pedicle (connecting the cyst to a nearby synovial joint) formed. Treatment options include watchful waiting, nonoperative aspiration/injection, and surgical removal. Although treatment is often unnecessary, many patients seeking consultation desire some form of definitive treatment. Cyst aspiration/injection is fraught with a high incidence of recurrence. Surgery generally results in lower rates of recurrence, but a higher incidence of complications. All current treatment options are suboptimal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lebanon 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 51 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Unspecified 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 60 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,182,073
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#33
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,579
of 94,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them