↓ Skip to main content

Overlap in nitrogen sources and redistribution of nitrogen between trees and grasses in a semi-arid savanna

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Overlap in nitrogen sources and redistribution of nitrogen between trees and grasses in a semi-arid savanna
Published in
Oecologia, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2848-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. V. R. Priyadarshini, Herbert H. T. Prins, Steven de Bie, Ignas M. A. Heitkönig, Stephan Woodborne, Gerrit Gort, Kevin Kirkman, Brian Fry, Hans de Kroon

Abstract

A key question in savanna ecology is how trees and grasses coexist under N limitation. We used N stable isotopes and N content to study N source partitioning across seasons from trees and associated grasses in a semi-arid savanna. We also used (15)N tracer additions to investigate possible redistribution of N by trees to grasses. Foliar stable N isotope ratio (δ(15)N) values were consistent with trees and grasses using mycorrhiza-supplied N in all seasons except in the wet season when they switched to microbially fixed N. The dependence of trees and grasses on mineralized soil N seemed highly unlikely based on seasonal variation in mineralization rates in the Kruger Park region. Remarkably, foliar δ(15)N values were similar for all three tree species differing in the potential for N fixation through nodulation. The tracer experiment showed that N was redistributed by trees to understory grasses in all seasons. Our results suggest that the redistribution of N from trees to grasses and uptake of N was independent of water redistribution. Although there is overlap of N sources between trees and grasses, dependence on biological sources of N coupled with redistribution of subsoil N by trees may contribute to the coexistence of trees and grasses in semi-arid savannas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 65 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 8%
Philosophy 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,639
of 4,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,718
of 306,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#38
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.