↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension, Brain Damage and Cognitive Decline

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
Title
Hypertension, Brain Damage and Cognitive Decline
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11906-013-0398-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dariusz Gąsecki, Mariusz Kwarciany, Walenty Nyka, Krzysztof Narkiewicz

Abstract

Loss of cognitive function is one the most devastating manifestations of ageing and vascular disease. Cognitive decline is rapidly becoming an important cause of disability worldwide and contributes significantly to increased mortality. There is growing evidence that hypertension is the most important modifiable vascular risk factor for development and progression of both cognitive decline and dementia. High blood pressure contributes to cerebral small and large vessel disease resulting in brain damage and dementia. A decline in cerebrovascular reserve capacity and emerging degenerative vascular wall changes underlie complete and incomplete brain infarcts, haemorrhages and white matter hyperintensities. This review discusses the complexity of factors linking hypertension to brain functional and structural changes, and to cognitive decline and dementia. The evidence for possible clinical markers useful for prevention of decreased cognitive ability, as well as recent data on vascular mechanism in the pathogenesis of cognitive decline, and the role of antihypertensive therapies in long-term prevention of late-life cognitive decline will be reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 260 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 78 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 22%
Psychology 27 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 5%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 92 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,830,311
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#72
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,650
of 219,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.