↓ Skip to main content

Differentiation of Escherichia coli serotypes using DC gradient insulator dielectrophoresis

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Differentiation of Escherichia coli serotypes using DC gradient insulator dielectrophoresis
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00216-013-7437-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul V. Jones, Alexa F. DeMichele, LaKeta Kemp, Mark A. Hayes

Abstract

Bacteria play a significant role in both human health and disease. An estimated 9.4 million cases of foodborne illness occur in the United States each year. As a result, rapid identification and characterization of microorganisms remains an important research objective. Despite limitations, selective culturing retains a central role among a cadre of identification strategies. For the past decade, separations-based approaches to rapid bacterial identification have been under investigation. Gradient insulator dielectrophoresis (g-iDEP) promises benefits in the form of rapid and specific separation of very similar bacteria, including serotypes of a single species. Furthermore, this approach allows simultaneous concentration of analyte, facilitating detection and downstream analysis. Differentiation of three serotypes or strains of Escherichia coli bacteria is demonstrated within a single g-iDEP microchannel, based on their characteristic electrokinetic properties. Whole cells were captured and concentrated using a range of applied potentials, which generated average electric fields between 160 and 470 V/cm. Bacteria remained viable after exposure to these fields, as determined by cellular motility. These results indicate the potential g-iDEP holds in terms of both separatory power and the possibility for diagnostic applications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 48 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 32%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 19 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Chemistry 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,089,097
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#128
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,343
of 229,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.