You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of the Postprandial Effects of Three Different Diets in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0079324 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hanna Fernemark, Christine Jaredsson, Bekim Bunjaku, Ulf Rosenqvist, Fredrik H. Nystrom, Hans Guldbrand |
| Abstract |
In the clinic setting both fasting levels of glucose and the area under the curve (AUC) of glucose, by determination of HbA1c levels, are used for risk assessments, in type 2 diabetes (NIDDM). However little is known about postprandial levels, and hence AUC, regarding other traditional risk factors such as insulin and blood-lipids and how this is affected by different diets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 18% |
| Spain | 9 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 22% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 131. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#320,023
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,551
of 222,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,867
of 320,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#134
of 5,164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.