You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What's familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Informetrics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.005 |
| Authors |
Alexander Serenko, Nick Bontis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 10 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 16% |
| Psychology | 6 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,478,721
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Informetrics
#74
of 754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,469
of 190,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Informetrics
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.