↓ Skip to main content

The one and the many: effects of the cell adhesion molecule pathway on neuropsychological function in psychosis

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The one and the many: effects of the cell adhesion molecule pathway on neuropsychological function in psychosis
Published in
Psychological Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1017/s0033291713002663
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Hargreaves, R. Anney, C. O'Dushlaine, K. K. Nicodemus, M. Gill, A. Corvin, D. Morris, Gary Donohoe

Abstract

Genetic studies of single gene variants have been criticized as providing a simplistic characterization of the genetic basis of illness risk that ignores the effects of other variants within the same biological pathways. Of candidate biological pathways for schizophrenia (SZ), the cell adhesion molecule (CAM) pathway has repeatedly been linked to both psychosis and neurocognitive dysfunction. Here we tested, using risk allele scores derived from the Schizophrenia Psychiatric Genome-Wide Association Study Consortium (PGC-SCZ), whether alleles within the CAM pathway were correlated with poorer neuropsychological function in patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,183,419
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Medicine
#3,798
of 5,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,404
of 306,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Medicine
#24
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.