You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The genetic basis of DOORS syndrome: an exome-sequencing study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lancet Neurology, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70265-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philippe M Campeau, Dalia Kasperaviciute, James T Lu, Lindsay C Burrage, Choel Kim, Mutsuki Hori, Berkley R Powell, Fiona Stewart, Têmis Maria Félix, Jenneke van den Ende, Marzena Wisniewska, Hülya Kayserili, Patrick Rump, Sheela Nampoothiri, Salim Aftimos, Antje Mey, Lal D V Nair, Michael L Begleiter, Isabelle De Bie, Girish Meenakshi, Mitzi L Murray, Gabriela M Repetto, Mahin Golabi, Edward Blair, Alison Male, Fabienne Giuliano, Ariana Kariminejad, William G Newman, Sanjeev S Bhaskar, Jonathan E Dickerson, Bronwyn Kerr, Siddharth Banka, Jacques C Giltay, Dagmar Wieczorek, Anna Tostevin, Joanna Wiszniewska, Sau Wai Cheung, Raoul C Hennekam, Richard A Gibbs, Brendan H Lee, Sanjay M Sisodiya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
United States | 2 | 29% |
Ireland | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
China | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 157 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 37 | 23% |
Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 34% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,192,814
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Neurology
#1,332
of 4,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,200
of 320,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Neurology
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.