↓ Skip to main content

Short-term high-intensity interval and continuous moderate-intensity training improve maximal aerobic power and diastolic filling during exercise

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Short-term high-intensity interval and continuous moderate-intensity training improve maximal aerobic power and diastolic filling during exercise
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00421-013-2773-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sam Esfandiari, Zion Sasson, Jack M. Goodman

Abstract

This study examined the effects of short-term high-intensity interval training (HIT) and continuous moderate-intensity training (CMT) on cardiac function in young, healthy men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 239 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 18%
Student > Master 39 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 13%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 63 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 87 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#4,119,273
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,139
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,120
of 319,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#13
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.