↓ Skip to main content

Extrasensory perception: Odorant and taste receptors beyond the nose and mouth

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extrasensory perception: Odorant and taste receptors beyond the nose and mouth
Published in
Pharmacology & Therapeutics, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.11.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon R. Foster, Eugeni Roura, Walter G. Thomas

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane receptors and are prime therapeutic targets. The odorant and taste receptors account for over half of the GPCR repertoire, yet they are generally excluded from large-scale, drug candidate analyses. Accumulating molecular evidence indicates that the odorant and taste receptors are widely expressed throughout the body and functional beyond the oronasal cavity - with roles including nutrient sensing, autophagy, muscle regeneration, regulation of gut motility, protective airway reflexes, bronchodilation, and respiratory disease. Given this expanding array of actions, the restricted perception of these GPCRs as mere mediators of smell and taste is outdated. Moreover, delineation of the precise actions of odorant and taste GPCRs continues to be hampered by the relative paucity of selective and specific experimental tools, as well as the lack of defined receptor pharmacology. In this review, we summarize the evidence for expression and function of odorant and taste receptors in tissues beyond the nose and mouth, and we highlight their broad potential in physiology and pathophysiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 14 8%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Chemistry 11 7%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 38 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,614,816
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#220
of 2,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,473
of 315,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.